Defend double C trademark, Chanel sued Chinese jewelry company

China's most influential fashion business media

On Tuesday, France's classic luxury brand, replica chanel bags uk, won the case in a trademark protection brand "double C" logo.

The General Court announced that after the European Intellectual Property Office (hereinafter referred to as the EUIPO) the appeals committee sued Chinese citizen Li Jing Zhou in Spain and the name of the cheap replica chanel handbags UK Italy Rome Golden jewelry company Rose 999 Srl's sentencing decision invalid.

In 2010, Zhou registered a logo consisting of two S cross links for Golden Rose 999 Srl. replica chanel bags uk insists the logo is very similar to the company's "double C" trademark registered in France in 1989 and has been brought to court. In 2014, the EUIPO committee rejected Chanel's request to revoke the registration of the logo.

However, the European Court of general justice believes that the two signs do have a lot of similarities, and Zhou's design inspiration has largely followed the cheap replica chanel handbags UK logo, which could mislead consumers.

Although the European Court of Justice announced that EUIPO's decision was invalid, it still rejected cheap replica chanel handbags UK's claim to cancel the "double S" trademark because it was not within the purview of the court. The court has now asked EUIPO to pay for the case.

Image above: left replica chanel bags uk, double C, logo, right, Golden, Rose, 999, Srl, double S, logo

Last month, Chanel won a multimillion dollar trademark infringement lawsuit alleging that about 30 businesses on the Amazon, the US business platform, were suspected of selling counterfeit Chanel branded logo products. (see "gorgeous annals" related reports: Chanel win and Amazon infringement business lawsuit, a total of $3 million compensation, shrink to the original request of twenty points one)

The court of California in the United States decided on the case. Chanel first, each sales of counterfeit goods businesses for $2 million in damages, the court will be reduced to $100 thousand, a total of $3 million, but according to the usual experience, the Chanel is unlikely to really get the money.

In recent years Chanel spare no effort in the fight against infringement of intellectual property rights, making and selling fake brand initiatives, for allegedly stealing any brand design ideas or attempt to use a similar brand name, domain name (Chanel-issime, Chanel-ed, the behavior of Chanels, Chanel-ized and so on) without a soft hand.

Recently, more reports on trademark infringement and cracking down on counterfeit and shoddy goods have been reported in the luxury fashion industry as follows:

Louis Vuitton sued 218 online selling businesses won the case, awarded $22 million 900 thousand

Everywhere sued others infringement Adidas also became defendant! Basel Art Fair limited v. Adidas shoes trademark infringement

Alexander Wang lost $90 million in counterfeiting and domain names, and seized 459 websites

Under Armour v. China Sportswear retailer Uncle Martian trademark infringement

Zegna v. China company trademark infringement, lost 2 million yuan

Canada's high-end outdoor brand Moose Knuckles sued Chinese merchants for selling fake goods in favor of $52 million

Information source: US web site, WWD, EUR-Lex, legal documents, Hyperbeast

Source: United States website WWD

Editor in chief: LeZhi

Related labels:

Chanel

dollar

Amazon

European Union

U.S.A